Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Quart Sized Baggies


We think this commentary requires a minimal amount of introduction.
Namaste,
Euroswydd, Reiki Clowne and Mort

I’m leaving in less than two weeks for a much anticipated trip to the Bordeaux region of France. Since 911 there has been much ado about protecting ourselves from terrorism and to that end grandiose speeches oozing with declarations have prompted equally grand gestures—uniformed stern faced monitors, screeching chimes, warning bells, flashing lights, x-ray vision and general to extreme inconvenience—to proliferate at airport security checkpoints. Now one must unpack, unclothe and then redo what took days in a matter of minutes, as those behind shuffle forward to meet the same fate.
Add to that mix the incident of the past year. A “credible/substantiated” terrorist plot involving the anticipated employment of gels, liquids, pastes, pressurized containers and other solutions and items of similar consistency surfaced to wreak havoc for air travelers. Now one cannot bring such items on board unless their containers can be fit in a quart—not a pint, gallon or any other capacity—size zip lock baggie. For those of us who do not use that size or don’t have enough of the offending items to fit a bag that large, logic decrees that a smaller size should suffice. Apparently logic has nothing to do with it as a friend of mine discovered recently after presenting her pint sized bag with minimal items to the security personnel. She was chastised, provided with a quart sized bag and sent away to repackage and begin the entire security checkpoint procedure all over again. Such rigid, blind, illogical adherence to rules and regulations does not promote confidence that these officials possess the capacity to keep me and mine safe.
However, in spite of the fact that I find this all just ridiculous, since I do want to be allowed on board with as little fuss and muss as possible and finding myself in the grocery store yesterday, I perused the appropriate aisle for baggies. Variations on the quart size theme abounded. Since I only need one not 50, 200 or even 25, I opted for the cheapest box that coincidentally had only 22—this involved easy math to figure out 2/$5.00 for 25 as opposed to 2/$4.00 for 20 and so on and so forth. Hopefully I will go on 22 trips before I have to use either a different size or none at all. As I put the box in the cart an airplane’s picture caught my eye. Affixed to the front of the box a sticker boasted that the contents “meets airport security guidelines”. In the not so distant past baggies were for sandwiches or storing leftovers and didn’t zip much less conform to ineffectual security guidelines.
Apparently the latest advertising hype will revolve around a quart size baggie’s aptitude for providing a consumer/traveler the ability to pass inspection with ease prior to boarding a plane. Touting zip locks and holding full baggies upside down while contents stay within are rapidly becoming as antiquated as those outdated models that close by folding over.
I wonder what the anthropologists of the next century will conjecture about our culture when they uncover evidence of our habits. Or will they be contained within saran wrap with not a thought that hasn’t been pumped into their systems.